Review of Coulson J's decision in Hutton

Helena White talks about the implications of Coulson J's decision in Hutton v Wilson for defendants who are dissatisfied with an adjudicator's decision and want to resist enforcement by raising substantive issues.

This 15-minute video is comprised of the following chapters:

  • The facts of the Hutton case
  • Alternative ways to contest an adjudication enforcement
  • Coulson J's decision in Hutton
  • Coulson J's test for deciding if a Part 8 claim can be heard
  • The meaning of 'unconscionability'
  • The decision's impact on subsequent cases
  • Practical tips

Case references:

  • Hutton Construction Ltd v Wilson Properties (London) Ltd [2017] EWHC 517 (TCC)
  • Caledonian Modular Ltd v Mar City Developments Ltd [2015] EWHC 1855 (TCC)
  • Macob Civil Engineering Ltd v Morrison Construction Ltd [1999] C.L.C. 739
  • Geoffrey Osborne Ltd v Atkins Rail Ltd [2009] EWHC 2425 (TCC)
  • Kersfield Developments (Bridge Road) Ltd v Bray & Slaughter Ltd [2017] EWHC 15 (TCC)
  • Structure Consulting Ltd v Maroush Food Production Ltd [2017] EWHC 962 (TCC)
  • Willott Partnership Homes Ltd v Bethel Retirement Villages-Herne Bay Court Ltd (unreported), 10 April 2017, (TCC)

NEW TO LEGALPD.COM? - To access this FREE content, please click on the 'Buy Now' button and follow the instructions. You'll need to register as a New User and then select 'Invoice Me', but you will NOT be charged.


Date:Published Monday 04 September 2017
Duration:0.25 hours
CPD hours:0 hours
Price:£0.00 + VAT
Price includes:  Access for one month to:
• View the content and complete the CPD quiz
• Download the transcript, audio recording and slides (where available)

Helena White

Hardwicke


New Content
 
Please enter your password and click 'Proceed' to add this item to your MY CONTENT library.

Note: if your subscription is limited by CPD hours, the advertised number will be deducted from your balance.


PROCEED   CANCEL