Review of Coulson J's decision in Hutton

Helena White talks about the implications of Coulson J's decision in Hutton v Wilson for defendants who are dissatisfied with an adjudicator's decision and want to resist enforcement by raising substantive issues.

This 15-minute video is comprised of the following chapters:

  • The facts of the Hutton case
  • Alternative ways to contest an adjudication enforcement
  • Coulson J's decision in Hutton
  • Coulson J's test for deciding if a Part 8 claim can be heard
  • The meaning of 'unconscionability'
  • The decision's impact on subsequent cases
  • Practical tips

Case references:

  • Hutton Construction Ltd v Wilson Properties (London) Ltd [2017] EWHC 517 (TCC)
  • Caledonian Modular Ltd v Mar City Developments Ltd [2015] EWHC 1855 (TCC)
  • Macob Civil Engineering Ltd v Morrison Construction Ltd [1999] C.L.C. 739
  • Geoffrey Osborne Ltd v Atkins Rail Ltd [2009] EWHC 2425 (TCC)
  • Kersfield Developments (Bridge Road) Ltd v Bray & Slaughter Ltd [2017] EWHC 15 (TCC)
  • Structure Consulting Ltd v Maroush Food Production Ltd [2017] EWHC 962 (TCC)
  • Willott Partnership Homes Ltd v Bethel Retirement Villages-Herne Bay Court Ltd (unreported), 10 April 2017, (TCC)

NEW TO LEGALPD.COM? - To access this FREE content, please click on the 'Buy Now' button and follow the instructions. You'll need to register as a New User and then select 'Invoice Me', but you will NOT be charged.

Date:Published Monday 04 September 2017
Duration:0.25 hours
CPD hours:0 hours
Price:£0.00 + VAT
Price includes:  Access for one month to:
• View the content and complete the CPD quiz
• Download the transcript, audio recording and slides (where available)

Helena White


New Content
Please enter your password and click 'Proceed' to add this item to your MY CONTENT library.

Note: if your subscription is limited by CPD hours, the advertised number will be deducted from your balance.