Doctors' Injunctions

In this 34-minute video, Betsan and Stuart share their expertise on doctors' injunctions.

Topics discussed:

  • Why injunctions are so attractive to doctors
  • Principles to be applied in deciding whether to grant relief
  • Implications of the decision in Chhabra
  • Other instances where the courts have intervened in a disciplinary process

Cases referenced:

  • Chhabra v West London Mental Health NHS Trust [2013] UKSC 80
  • Johnson v Unisys Ltd [2001] UKHL 13
  • Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKSC 58
  • American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] A.C. 396
  • Chakrabarty v Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust [2014] EWHC 2735 (QB)
  • A v B (Unfair Dismissal) [2003] I.R.L.R. 405
  • Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust v Roldan [2010] EWCA Civ 522
  • Crawford v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138
  • Mezey v South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust [2010] EWCA Civ 293
  • Hussain v Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 1670 (QB)
  • Mattu v University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 641
  • Fynes v St George's Hospital NHS Trust [2014] EWHC 756 (QB)
  • Irani v Southampton and South West Hampshire HA [1985] I.C.R. 590
  • Makhdum v Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust [2012] EWHC 4015 (QB)

You can claim the CPD hours shown below by completing the short multiple choice quiz that accompanies this video. For information about our accreditation, please see our CPD Information page.


Date:Published Wednesday 24 August 2016
Duration:0.5 hours
CPD hours:0.5 hours

Betsan Criddle

Old Square Chambers

Stuart Brittenden

Old Square Chambers

 
Please enter your password and click 'Proceed' to add this item to your MY CONTENT library.

Note: if your subscription is limited by CPD hours, the advertised number will be deducted from your balance.


PROCEED   CANCEL